Difference between revisions of "RFC6166"

From RFC-Wiki
 
Line 24: Line 24:
 
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
+
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of [[RFC5741|RFC 5741]].
  
 
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
Line 35: Line 35:
 
document authors.  All rights reserved.
 
document authors.  All rights reserved.
  
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+
This document is subject to [[BCP78|BCP 78]] and the IETF Trust's Legal
 
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
Line 49: Line 49:
 
Apart from this document, there is no existing document specifying a
 
Apart from this document, there is no existing document specifying a
 
registry for PIM message types.  PIM version 1 made use of IGMP
 
registry for PIM message types.  PIM version 1 made use of IGMP
[[[RFC1112]]], and there is an IGMP registry [IGMPREG] listing the
+
[[RFC1112]], and there is an IGMP registry [IGMPREG] listing the
 
message types used by PIM version 1.  PIM version 2, however, is not
 
message types used by PIM version 1.  PIM version 2, however, is not
 
based on IGMP, and a separate PIM message type registry is needed.
 
based on IGMP, and a separate PIM message type registry is needed.
 
There are currently several RFCs specifying new PIM version 2 message
 
There are currently several RFCs specifying new PIM version 2 message
 
types that should be in this new registry.  They are the RFCs for PIM
 
types that should be in this new registry.  They are the RFCs for PIM
Dense Mode [[[RFC3973]]], PIM Sparse Mode [[[RFC4601]]], and Bidirectional
+
Dense Mode [[RFC3973]], PIM Sparse Mode [[RFC4601]], and Bidirectional
PIM [[[RFC5015]]].
+
PIM [[RFC5015]].
  
 
This document specifies the initial content of the new PIM message
 
This document specifies the initial content of the new PIM message
Line 88: Line 88:
 
Type    Name                                      Reference
 
Type    Name                                      Reference
 
------  ----------------------------------------  -------------------
 
------  ----------------------------------------  -------------------
   0      Hello                                    [[[RFC3973]]] [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   0      Hello                                    [[RFC3973]] [[RFC4601]]
   1      Register                                [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   1      Register                                [[RFC4601]]
   2      Register Stop                            [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   2      Register Stop                            [[RFC4601]]
   3      Join/Prune                              [[[RFC3973]]] [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   3      Join/Prune                              [[RFC3973]] [[RFC4601]]
   4      Bootstrap                                [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   4      Bootstrap                                [[RFC4601]]
   5      Assert                                  [[[RFC3973]]] [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   5      Assert                                  [[RFC3973]] [[RFC4601]]
   6      Graft                                    [[[RFC3973]]]
+
   6      Graft                                    [[RFC3973]]
   7      Graft-Ack                                [[[RFC3973]]]
+
   7      Graft-Ack                                [[RFC3973]]
   8      Candidate RP Advertisement              [[[RFC4601]]]
+
   8      Candidate RP Advertisement              [[RFC4601]]
   9      State Refresh                            [[[RFC3973]]]
+
   9      State Refresh                            [[RFC3973]]
  10      DF Election                              [[[RFC5015]]]
+
  10      DF Election                              [[RFC5015]]
 
  11-14  Unassigned
 
  11-14  Unassigned
 
  15      Reserved (for extension of type space)  this document
 
  15      Reserved (for extension of type space)  this document
Line 105: Line 105:
  
 
Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF
 
Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF
Review" model; see [[[RFC5226]]].
+
Review" model; see [[RFC5226]].
  
 
== Acknowledgements ==
 
== Acknowledgements ==
Line 117: Line 117:
  
 
[IGMPREG]  IANA, "Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) Type
 
[IGMPREG]  IANA, "Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) Type
           Numbers - per [[[RFC3228]]], [BCP57]", <http://www.iana.org/>.
+
           Numbers - per [[RFC3228]], [BCP57]", <http://www.iana.org/>.
  
[[[RFC1112]]]  Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD 5,
+
[[RFC1112]]  Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", [[STD5|STD 5]],
           RFC 1112, August 1989.
+
           [[RFC1112|RFC 1112]], August 1989.
  
[[[RFC3973]]]  Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
+
[[RFC3973]]  Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
 
           Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
 
           Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
           Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, January 2005.
+
           Specification (Revised)", [[RFC3973|RFC 3973]], January 2005.
  
[[[RFC4601]]]  Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,
+
[[RFC4601]]  Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,
 
           "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
 
           "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
           Protocol Specification (Revised)", RFC 4601, August 2006.
+
           Protocol Specification (Revised)", [[RFC4601|RFC 4601]], August 2006.
  
[[[RFC5015]]]  Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
+
[[RFC5015]]  Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
 
           "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
 
           "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
           PIM)", RFC 5015, October 2007.
+
           PIM)", [[RFC5015|RFC 5015]], October 2007.
  
[[[RFC5226]]]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
+
[[RFC5226]]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
           IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
+
           IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", [[BCP26|BCP 26]], [[RFC5226|RFC 5226]],
 
           May 2008.
 
           May 2008.
  

Latest revision as of 04:31, 22 October 2020

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Venaas Request for Comments: 6166 Cisco Systems Category: Standards Track April 2011 ISSN: 2070-1721

                A Registry for PIM Message Types

Abstract

This document provides instructions to IANA for the creation of a registry for PIM message types. It specifies the initial content of the registry, based on existing RFCs specifying PIM message types. It also specifies a procedure for registering new types.

In addition to this, one message type is reserved, and may be used for a future extension of the message type space.

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6166.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Introduction

Apart from this document, there is no existing document specifying a registry for PIM message types. PIM version 1 made use of IGMP RFC1112, and there is an IGMP registry [IGMPREG] listing the message types used by PIM version 1. PIM version 2, however, is not based on IGMP, and a separate PIM message type registry is needed. There are currently several RFCs specifying new PIM version 2 message types that should be in this new registry. They are the RFCs for PIM Dense Mode RFC3973, PIM Sparse Mode RFC4601, and Bidirectional PIM RFC5015.

This document specifies the initial content of the new PIM message type registry, based on those existing RFCs. This document also specifies a procedure for registering new PIM message types.

In addition to this, this document reserves one message type. This type may be used for a future extension of the message type space. The current message type space is only 4 bits, so it is not unlikely that this will be needed. How exactly the extension should be done is left to a future document.

Security Considerations

This document only creates an IANA registry. There may be a security benefit in a well-known place for finding information on which PIM message types are valid and how they are used. Apart from that, there are no security considerations.

IANA Considerations

IANA has created a PIM message type registry. It has been placed in the "Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)" branch of the tree. Each entry in the registry consists of a message type, a message name, and references to the documents defining the type. The message type is a 4-bit integer with possible values from 0 to 15.

Initial Registry

The initial content of the registry should be as follows.

Type Name Reference


---------------------------------------- -------------------

 0      Hello                                    RFC3973 RFC4601
 1      Register                                 RFC4601
 2      Register Stop                            RFC4601
 3      Join/Prune                               RFC3973 RFC4601
 4      Bootstrap                                RFC4601
 5      Assert                                   RFC3973 RFC4601
 6      Graft                                    RFC3973
 7      Graft-Ack                                RFC3973
 8      Candidate RP Advertisement               RFC4601
 9      State Refresh                            RFC3973
10      DF Election                              RFC5015
11-14   Unassigned
15      Reserved (for extension of type space)   this document

Assignment of New Message Types

Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF Review" model; see RFC5226.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Toerless Eckert for his suggestion to reserve a type for future extension of the message type space. Also thanks to Mykyta Yevstifeyev for reviewing the document and proposing improvements to the text.

Informative References

[IGMPREG] IANA, "Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) Type

          Numbers - per RFC3228, [BCP57]", <http://www.iana.org/>.

RFC1112 Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD 5,

          RFC 1112, August 1989.

RFC3973 Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol

          Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
          Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, January 2005.

RFC4601 Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,

          "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
          Protocol Specification (Revised)", RFC 4601, August 2006.

RFC5015 Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,

          "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
          PIM)", RFC 5015, October 2007.

RFC5226 Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an

          IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
          May 2008.

Author's Address

Stig Venaas Cisco Systems Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 USA

EMail: [email protected]