Difference between revisions of "RFC8808"

From RFC-Wiki
 
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
 
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in RFC 8342.
+
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [[RFC8342|RFC 8342]].
  
 
'''Status of This Memo'''
 
'''Status of This Memo'''
Line 30: Line 30:
 
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
 
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
 
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
+
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of [[RFC7841|RFC 7841]].
  
 
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
 
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
Line 41: Line 41:
 
document authors.  All rights reserved.
 
document authors.  All rights reserved.
  
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
+
This document is subject to [[BCP78|BCP 78]] and the IETF Trust's Legal
 
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
Line 84: Line 84:
  
 
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
 
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture defined in [[[RFC8342]]].
+
Management Datastore Architecture defined in [[RFC8342]].
  
 
=== Terminology ===
 
=== Terminology ===
Line 91: Line 91:
 
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
 
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [[[RFC2119]]] [[[RFC8174]]] when, and only when, they appear in all
+
[[BCP14|BCP 14]] [[RFC2119]] [[RFC8174]] when, and only when, they appear in all
 
capitals, as shown here.
 
capitals, as shown here.
  
The following terms are defined in [[[RFC8342]]] and [[[RFC7950]]] and are
+
The following terms are defined in [[RFC8342]] and [[RFC7950]] and are
 
not redefined here:
 
not redefined here:
  
Line 167: Line 167:
  
 
Following the guidelines for defining datastores in Appendix A of
 
Following the guidelines for defining datastores in Appendix A of
[[[RFC8342]]], this document introduces a new optional datastore resource
+
[[RFC8342]], this document introduces a new optional datastore resource
 
named "factory-default" that represents a preset initial
 
named "factory-default" that represents a preset initial
 
configuration that can be used to initialize the configuration of a
 
configuration that can be used to initialize the configuration of a
Line 206: Line 206:
 
and MUST persist across device restarts.  If supported, the "factory-
 
and MUST persist across device restarts.  If supported, the "factory-
 
default" datastore MUST be included in the list of datastores in the
 
default" datastore MUST be included in the list of datastores in the
YANG library [[[RFC8525]]].
+
YANG library [[RFC8525]].
  
 
== YANG Module ==
 
== YANG Module ==
  
This module uses the "datastore" identity [[[RFC8342]]] and the
+
This module uses the "datastore" identity [[RFC8342]] and the
"default-deny-all" extension statement from [[[RFC8341]]].
+
"default-deny-all" extension statement from [[RFC8341]].
  
 
<CODE BEGINS> file "[email protected]"
 
<CODE BEGINS> file "[email protected]"
Line 222: Line 222:
 
       prefix ds;
 
       prefix ds;
 
       reference
 
       reference
         "RFC 8342: Network Management Datastore Architecture
+
         "[[RFC8342|RFC 8342]]: Network Management Datastore Architecture
 
           (NMDA)";
 
           (NMDA)";
 
     }
 
     }
Line 228: Line 228:
 
       prefix nacm;
 
       prefix nacm;
 
       reference
 
       reference
         "RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
+
         "[[RFC8341|RFC 8341]]: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
 
     }
 
     }
  
Line 261: Line 261:
 
         (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
 
         (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
  
         This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8808; see the
+
         This version of this YANG module is part of [[RFC8808|RFC 8808]]; see the
 
         RFC itself for full legal notices.";
 
         RFC itself for full legal notices.";
  
Line 268: Line 268:
 
         "Initial revision.";
 
         "Initial revision.";
 
       reference
 
       reference
         "RFC 8808: A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings";
+
         "[[RFC8808|RFC 8808]]: A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings";
 
     }
 
     }
  
Line 306: Line 306:
  
 
IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within
 
IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within
the "IETF XML Registry" [[[RFC3688]]]:
+
the "IETF XML Registry" [[RFC3688]]:
  
 
URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-factory-default
 
URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-factory-default
Line 313: Line 313:
  
 
IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module
 
IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module
Names" subregistry [[[RFC6020]]] within the "YANG Parameters" registry:
+
Names" subregistry [[RFC6020]] within the "YANG Parameters" registry:
  
 
Name:  ietf-factory-default
 
Name:  ietf-factory-default
Line 324: Line 324:
 
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
 
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
 
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
 
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [[[RFC6241]]] or RESTCONF [[[RFC8040]]].  The lowest NETCONF layer
+
as NETCONF [[RFC6241]] or RESTCONF [[RFC8040]].  The lowest NETCONF layer
 
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
 
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [[[RFC6242]]].  The lowest RESTCONF layer
+
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [[RFC6242]].  The lowest RESTCONF layer
 
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
 
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[[[RFC8446]]].
+
[[RFC8446]].
  
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [[[RFC8341]]]
+
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [[RFC8341]]
 
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
 
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
 
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
 
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
Line 339: Line 339:
 
datastore is considered sensitive and therefore has been restricted
 
datastore is considered sensitive and therefore has been restricted
 
by using the "default-deny-all" access control statement defined in
 
by using the "default-deny-all" access control statement defined in
[[[RFC8341]]].
+
[[RFC8341]].
  
 
The "factory-reset" RPC can prevent any further management of the
 
The "factory-reset" RPC can prevent any further management of the
Line 364: Line 364:
 
=== Normative References ===
 
=== Normative References ===
  
[[[RFC2119]]]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
+
[[RFC2119]]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
           Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
+
           Requirement Levels", [[BCP14|BCP 14]], [[RFC2119|RFC 2119]],
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
  
[[[RFC3688]]]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
+
[[RFC3688]]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", [[BCP81|BCP 81]], [[RFC3688|RFC 3688]],
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
  
[[[RFC6020]]]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
+
[[RFC6020]]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
           the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
+
           the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", [[RFC6020|RFC 6020]],
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
  
[[[RFC6241]]]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
+
[[RFC6241]]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
 
           and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
 
           and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
           (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
+
           (NETCONF)", [[RFC6241|RFC 6241]], DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
  
[[[RFC6242]]]  Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
+
[[RFC6242]]  Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
           Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
+
           Shell (SSH)", [[RFC6242|RFC 6242]], DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
  
[[[RFC7950]]]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
+
[[RFC7950]]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
           RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
+
           [[RFC7950|RFC 7950]], DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
  
[[[RFC8040]]]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
+
[[RFC8040]]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
           Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
+
           Protocol", [[RFC8040|RFC 8040]], DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
  
[[[RFC8174]]]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
+
[[RFC8174]]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
           2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
+
           2119 Key Words", [[BCP14|BCP 14]], [[RFC8174|RFC 8174]], DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
 
           May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
 
           May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
  
[[[RFC8341]]]  Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
+
[[RFC8341]]  Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
           Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
+
           Access Control Model", [[STD91|STD 91]], [[RFC8341|RFC 8341]],
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
  
[[[RFC8342]]]  Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
+
[[RFC8342]]  Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
 
           and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
 
           and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
           (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
+
           (NMDA)", [[RFC8342|RFC 8342]], DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
  
[[[RFC8446]]]  Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
+
[[RFC8446]]  Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
           Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
+
           Version 1.3", [[RFC8446|RFC 8446]], DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
  
[[[RFC8525]]]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Watsen, K.,
+
[[RFC8525]]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Watsen, K.,
           and R. Wilton, "YANG Library", RFC 8525,
+
           and R. Wilton, "YANG Library", [[RFC8525|RFC 8525]],
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC8525, March 2019,
 
           DOI 10.17487/RFC8525, March 2019,
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8525>.
 
           <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8525>.

Latest revision as of 11:26, 30 October 2020



Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Q. Wu Request for Comments: 8808 Huawei Category: Standards Track B. Lengyel ISSN: 2070-1721 Ericsson Hungary

                                                              Y. Niu
                                                              Huawei
                                                         August 2020
         A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings

Abstract

This document defines a YANG data model with the "factory-reset" RPC to allow clients to reset a server back to its factory default condition. It also defines an optional "factory-default" datastore to allow clients to read the factory default configuration for the device.

The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in RFC 8342.

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8808.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

1. Introduction

 1.1.  Terminology

2. "Factory-Reset" RPC 3. "Factory-Default" Datastore 4. YANG Module 5. IANA Considerations 6. Security Considerations 7. References

 7.1.  Normative References
 7.2.  Informative References

Acknowledgements Contributors Authors' Addresses

Introduction

This document defines a YANG data model and associated mechanism to reset a server to its factory default contents. This mechanism may be used, for example, when the existing configuration has major errors and so restarting the configuration process from scratch is the best option.

A "factory-reset" remote procedure call (RPC) is defined within the YANG data model. When resetting a device, all previous configuration settings will be lost and replaced by the factory default contents.

In addition, an optional "factory-default" read-only datastore is defined within the YANG data model. This datastore contains the data to replace the contents of implemented read-write conventional configuration datastores at reset and can also be used in the <get-data> operation.

The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC8342.

Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 RFC2119 RFC8174 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

The following terms are defined in RFC8342 and RFC7950 and are not redefined here:

  • server
  • startup configuration datastore
  • candidate configuration datastore
  • running configuration datastore
  • intended configuration datastore
  • operational state datastore
  • conventional configuration datastore
  • datastore schema
  • RPC operation

This document defines the following term:

"factory-default" datastore: A read-only configuration datastore

  holding a preset initial configuration that is used to initialize
  the configuration of a server.  This datastore is referred to as
  "<factory-default>".

"Factory-Reset" RPC

This document introduces a new "factory-reset" RPC. Upon receiving the RPC:

  • All supported conventional read-write configuration datastores
  (i.e., <running>, <startup>, and <candidate>) are reset to the
  contents of <factory-default>.
  • Read-only datastores receive their contents from other datastores
  (e.g., <intended> gets its contents from <running>).
  • All data in any dynamic configuration datastores MUST be
  discarded.
  • The contents of the <operational> datastore MUST reflect the
  operational state of the device after applying the factory default
  configuration.

In addition, the "factory-reset" RPC MUST restore nonvolatile storage to factory condition. Depending on the system, this may entail deleting dynamically generated files, such as those containing keys (e.g., /etc/ssl/private), certificates (e.g., /etc/ssl), logs (e.g., /var/log), and temporary files (e.g., /tmp/*). Any other cryptographic keys that are part of the factory-installed image will be retained (such as an Initial Device Identifier (IDevID) certificate [BRSKI]). When this process includes security-sensitive data such as cryptographic keys or passwords, it is RECOMMENDED to perform the deletion in as thorough a manner as possible (e.g., overwriting the physical storage medium with zeros and/or random bits for repurposing or end-of-life (EOL) disposal) to reduce the risk of the sensitive material being recoverable. The "factory-reset" RPC MAY also be used to trigger some other resetting tasks such as restarting the node or some of the software processes.

Note that operators should be aware that since all read-write datastores are immediately reset to factory default, the device may become unreachable as a host on the network. It is important to understand how a given vendor's device will behave after the RPC is executed. Implementors SHOULD reboot the device and get it properly configured or otherwise restart processes needed to bootstrap it.

"Factory-Default" Datastore

Following the guidelines for defining datastores in Appendix A of RFC8342, this document introduces a new optional datastore resource named "factory-default" that represents a preset initial configuration that can be used to initialize the configuration of a server. A device MAY implement the "factory-reset" RPC without implementing the "factory-default" datastore, which would only eliminate the ability to programmatically determine the factory default configuration.

Name: "factory-default".

YANG modules: The "factory-default" datastore schema MUST be either

  (1) the same as the conventional configuration datastores or
  (2) a subset of the datastore schema for the conventional
  configuration datastores.

YANG nodes: All "config true" data nodes.

Management operations: The contents of the datastore is set by the

  server in an implementation-dependent manner.  The contents cannot
  be changed by management operations via the Network Configuration
  Protocol (NETCONF), RESTCONF, the CLI, etc., unless specialized,
  dedicated operations are provided.  The datastore can be read
  using the standard NETCONF/RESTCONF protocol operations.  The
  "factory-reset" operation copies the factory default contents to
  <running> and, if present, <startup> and/or <candidate>.  The
  contents of these datastores is then propagated automatically to
  any other read-only datastores, e.g., <intended> and
  <operational>.

Origin: This document does not define a new origin identity, as it

  does not interact with the <operational> datastore.

Protocols: RESTCONF, NETCONF, and other management protocols.

Defining YANG module: "ietf-factory-default".

The contents of <factory-default> are defined by the device vendor and MUST persist across device restarts. If supported, the "factory- default" datastore MUST be included in the list of datastores in the YANG library RFC8525.

YANG Module

This module uses the "datastore" identity RFC8342 and the "default-deny-all" extension statement from RFC8341.

file "[email protected]"

  module ietf-factory-default {
    yang-version 1.1;
    namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-factory-default";
    prefix fd;
    import ietf-datastores {
      prefix ds;
      reference
        "RFC 8342: Network Management Datastore Architecture
         (NMDA)";
    }
    import ietf-netconf-acm {
      prefix nacm;
      reference
        "RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
    }
    organization
      "IETF Network Modeling (netmod) Working Group";
    contact
      "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
       WG List:  <mailto:[email protected]>
       Editor:   Qin Wu
                 <mailto:[email protected]>
       Editor:   Balazs Lengyel
                 <mailto:[email protected]>
       Editor:   Ye Niu
                 <mailto:[email protected]>";
    description
      "This module provides functionality to reset a server to its
       factory default configuration and, when supported, to
       discover the factory default configuration contents
       independently of resetting the server.
       Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
       authors of the code.  All rights reserved.
       Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
       without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
       to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
       set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
       Relating to IETF Documents
       (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
       This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8808; see the
       RFC itself for full legal notices.";
    revision 2020-08-31 {
      description
        "Initial revision.";
      reference
        "RFC 8808: A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings";
    }
    feature factory-default-datastore {
      description
        "Indicates that the factory default configuration is
         available as a datastore.";
    }
    rpc factory-reset {
      nacm:default-deny-all;
      description
        "The server resets all datastores to their factory
         default contents and any nonvolatile storage back to
         factory condition, deleting all dynamically
         generated files, including those containing keys,
         certificates, logs, and other temporary files.
         Depending on the factory default configuration, after
         being reset, the device may become unreachable on the
         network.";
    }
    identity factory-default {
      if-feature "factory-default-datastore";
      base ds:datastore;
      description
        "This read-only datastore contains the factory default
         configuration for the device that will be used to replace
         the contents of the read-write conventional configuration
         datastores during a 'factory-reset' RPC operation.";
    }
  }

IANA Considerations

IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" RFC3688:

URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-factory-default Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.

IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" subregistry RFC6020 within the "YANG Parameters" registry:

Name: ietf-factory-default Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-factory-default Prefix: fd Reference: 8808

Security Considerations

The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF RFC6241 or RESTCONF RFC8040. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) RFC6242. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS RFC8446.

The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) RFC8341 provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content.

Access to the "factory-reset" RPC operation and factory default values of all configuration data nodes within the "factory-default" datastore is considered sensitive and therefore has been restricted by using the "default-deny-all" access control statement defined in RFC8341.

The "factory-reset" RPC can prevent any further management of the device when the server is reset back to its factory default condition, e.g., the session and client configurations are included in the factory default contents or treated as dynamic files in nonvolatile storage and overwritten by the "factory-reset" RPC.

The operational disruption caused by setting the configuration to factory default contents or the lack of appropriate security control on the factory default configuration varies greatly, depending on the implementation and current configuration.

The nonvolatile storage is expected to be wiped clean and reset back to the factory default state, but there is no guarantee that the data is wiped clean according to any particular data-cleansing standard, and the owner of the device MUST NOT rely on any sensitive data (e.g., private keys) being forensically unrecoverable from the device's nonvolatile storage after a "factory-reset" RPC has been invoked.

References

Normative References

RFC2119 Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

          Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
          DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

RFC3688 Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,

          DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

RFC6020 Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for

          the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
          DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.

RFC6241 Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,

          and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
          (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

RFC6242 Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure

          Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.

RFC7950 Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",

          RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.

RFC8040 Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF

          Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.

RFC8174 Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC

          2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
          May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

RFC8341 Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration

          Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
          DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.

RFC8342 Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,

          and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
          (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.

RFC8446 Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol

          Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.

RFC8525 Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Watsen, K.,

          and R. Wilton, "YANG Library", RFC 8525,
          DOI 10.17487/RFC8525, March 2019,
          <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8525>.

Informative References

[BRSKI] Pritikin, M., Richardson, M. C., Eckert, T., Behringer, M.

          H., and K. Watsen, "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key
          Infrastructures (BRSKI)", Work in Progress, Internet-
          Draft, draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-43, 7
          August 2020, <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-
          anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-43>.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Juergen Schoenwaelder, Ladislav Lhotka, Alex Campbell, Joe Clarke, Robert Wilton, Kent Watsen, Joel Jaeggli, Lou Berger, Andy Bierman, Susan Hares, Benjamin Kaduk, Stephen Kent, Stewart Bryant, Éric Vyncke, Murray Kucherawy, Roman Danyliw, Tony Przygienda, and John Heasley for reviewing, and providing important input to, this document.

Contributors

Rohit R Ranade Huawei

Email: [email protected]

Authors' Addresses

Qin Wu Huawei Yuhua District 101 Software Avenue Nanjing Jiangsu, 210012 China

Email: [email protected]

Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Budapest Magyar Tudosok korutja 11 1117 Hungary

Phone: +36-70-330-7909 Email: [email protected]

Ye Niu Huawei

Email: [email protected]